Rabu, 23 Januari 2013

5 New Rules: Don't Get Fooled Again When Buying Enterprise Technology

"Change it had to come

We knew it all along

We were liberated from the fall that's all"

- The Who, "Won't Get Fooled Again"

With Washington festooned over the weekend with banners and parties alongside the serious national dialogue about the issues of the day, we all understand that the world has changed significantly in the last four years. It has become a more distributed, inter-connected place in every aspect of our society.

The chiaroscuro of the Cold War has completely disappeared - and we're now seeing a complex and nuanced combination of emerging economic and military powers.

And there are key parallels in information technology with significant implications for IT buyers.

The Cloud Has Already Won

Four years ago, people were still debating the NIST definition of Cloud Computing. Indeed, in 2009, Gartner declared Cloud the most hyped technology in the world.

Today, you'd have to be hiding under a big rock ' trying to avoid the HarBowl, perhaps ' if you do not realize the IT Stack has irrevocably flipped from client-server/Web to Cloud. Talk to any entrepreneur, and the big argument is not whether to rent the IT infrastructure from an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) provider (e.g., Amazon or Rackspace), but what possible reason could someone have to burn precsious capital on buying their own servers and routers.

IT is a huge industry. At a projected $3.7 trillion in 2013 (according to Gartner), IT would be one of the five largest economies in the world, behind Japan but ahead of India. As Dan Lyons wrote last year, industry combatants focus on the potential of a $1 trillion transfer of wealth from the large legacy tech vendors to the new upstarts. So the money is there.

The unanswered question, though, is what happens to the hows, whys and whats of IT acquisition? How do you buy enterprise technology in the era of the new stack?

Let me break it down into 5 key elements:

1. The New Boss

Traditionally IT decision making is made in small, vertical slices of the stack. Network buyers procure networking components, storage buyers acquire disks and flash, and functional leadership drives application acquisition with their IT partners, etc.

That is changing rapidly as business decision makers (e.g., line management) set the rate and pace of operations and require IT to respond accordingly. As we learned at Nicira, in the Cloud era, this has led to the emergence of a new category of IT elite called Cloud Architects, who are responsible for making all the components come together.

It has led to an increased focus on both proprietary and open source cloud architectures that enable applications quickly and reduce the intense, overwhelming micro-focus on the cloud's subcomponents. Rapidly enabling applications that support business processes will eventually drive all IT decision making. My advice: Look out for the cloud guy. He is the new power broker.

2. Bandwidth And Processing For Nothing, And The I/O For Free

In the client-server era systems model, hardware and software were custom-built to work together to enable a specific performance envelope. While specific, targeted use cases will always remain, increasingly Moore's Law holds sway.

The x86 platform in servers, flash in storage and merchant silicon in networking increasingly dominates the bottom, infrastructure layers of the stack. IT buyers are getting the horsepower at scale by riding this curve and looking to vendors who pull their value through software.

It's the death of proprietary hardware and the emergence of smart software in IT. Remember this when your tech sales guy comes calling and brags about his chips.

3. Why Buy When You Can Lease?

There has been a ton written about Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) replacing packaged software, so I wont' bother repeating it. But what happens when Web-scale infrastructure is rentable by the hour (and as Amazon has shown, prices drop along the way)? Without having to deal with real estate, power and cooling, enormous computing power is available by the hour. Determining the differences among the providers ' i.e., how well suited are they for your applications - will be your next research activity. Build your IT plan/budget around renting, not buying.

4. There And Back Again, A Content Tale

Cloud-based collaboration environments like Box, DropBox and Google Drive are dramatically revamping how companies store and manage data - as well as how they collaborate both within and across corporate boundaries. The ease-of-use of these platforms compared to traditional software packages like Microsoft SharePoint make them a reality in your business whether you like it or not. Your employees already use them - even if they never bothered to tell you. Developing a content management strategy that accounts for these applications and what should be in the cloud and what should be on premise is critical, right now.

5. Any Way You Want It/That's The Way You Need It

Finally, all of your applications have to work on any screen, anytime. Remember, it was just four years ago that folks said the iPhone was not ready for business. At the time, people were thinking about smartphones the way radio executives thought about television. In 2013, IT buyers should consider only those applications that work across platform and screen categories.

Today's businesses need to move faster than they did four years ago: competition and globalization leave them no choice.

This creates friction with existing vendors, who have to deal with the reality of slower development cycles, predictable revenues and profits for shareholders, etc.

As buying behavior changes, though, the fast will eat the slow, including the IT buyers, who will see their influence wane if they cannot keep up with the competition cycle or lose influence as user-driven shadow IT takes over. The smart guys will be listening to The Who:

'I'll tip my hat to the new constitution

Take a bow for the new revolution

Smile and grin at the change all around me P

ick up my guitar and play Just like yesterday

Then I'll get on my knees and pray

We don't get fooled again'

 

Roger Daltrey image courtesy of s_bukley / Shutterstock.com. Pete Townsend image courtesy of Joe Seer / Shutterstock.com.



Forrester: Enterprises Must Look To Web For Mobile Success

The enterprise has always been buttoned-down, conservative. And that's a good thing. Let the wacky Web crowd dabble in new-school technologies. Eventually they'll be back, begging for a white paper or two to explain best practices of green screens and mainframes. Right?

Not even close. As Forrester analysts Jeffrey Hammond and Julie Ask highlight in a new report, "The Future Of Mobile Application Development," enterprises must embrace mobile to succeed, with mobile development requiring modern development techniques and technologies like elastic infrastructure, open source and DevOps.  With over one billion smartphones globally, a number that keeps booming, they argue "We're entering a new age of application development that creates modern, compelling systems of engagement and links them with systems of record and systems of operation."

The problem is keeping pace:

"As companies target more devices and platforms when building modern applications, client-side development costs will increase. At the same time, they will need to deploy releases faster than ever. The only way to survive this Catch-22 is to lower the cost of testing new ideas and make it quicker and cheaper to separate the good ideas from the bad."

Looking For Solutions

Hammond and Ask aren't alone in pointing to this enterprise quandary, even within Forrester. Indeed, the need for flexible development is top of mind across the analyst firm, with analyst Mike Gualtieri arguing that "Traditional application development platforms such as Java and .NET are not necessarily the fastest approaches to develop applications. CIOs should investigate application development productivity platforms that make application development professionals more productive." And faster.

Like what?

In listing out elements of a successful mobile development strategy, Hammond and Ask point to a few essential technologies or technology approaches:

  • RESTful APIs that are asynchronous and can be consumed across multiple channels;
  • In-memory databases;
  • Open-source software...everywhere (lowers barriers to try new approaches);
  • Shared SQL databases and NoSQL databases (commodity hardware; scale-out architecture);
  • Dynamic languages (e.g., PHP, Django) in concert with static languages like Java and .NET;
  • Lightweight process communication frameworks like node.js and nginx (reduces resource consumption, among other things).

Each of the above elements contributes to a much more iterative, agile approach to development. I'd probably also add HTML5, as building native-only applications makes it harder to iterate an application and adds significantly more cost (up to 30%, according to Forrester's analysis). For enterprises who think these things nudge them toward acting more like their Web peers, the answer is "Yes." Just as the Web has gifted innovation like Hadoop to the enterprise so, too, is it paving the way for enhanced mobile development.

Here Comes The Future

It's almost trite to say it, but mobile is the future of computing, whether for the consumer or in the enterprise. As such, enterprises need to emulate the best of modern consumer Web approaches. The alternative, according to Forrester, is not pleasant: "Ignore these structural and business model changes and you risk creating a new generation of stovepiped mobile apps that are hard to maintain and ill-equipped for the changes that are just over the horizon."

Enterprise CIOs needn't panic, though. They have time.  

As Forrester points out, the attributes of successful mobile development they cite are being used by leading mobile app developers, but not perfectly, and still not widely. Mainstream mobile app developers are only just now learning to embrace more of these elements of success, and the enterprise is even slower. Based on Indeed.com's top-10 job trends, however, the enterprise is clearly waking up to these needs, hiring droves of developers with HTML5 and other related mobile experience. 

In sum, they have time, but they need to get moving on emulating Web companies. Now.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.



Taily: And 4 More Bizarre Gizmos From Japan And Elsewhere

Japan didn't just give us the quartz wristwatch, the DSLR, and the Playstation. It also gave us the Subway Sleeper, the Hay Fever Hat and the Kaba Kick Russian Roulette Toy for Kids! The country has long been a hub for wacky inventions you never knew you wanted, so in tribute to the keepers of the bizarre, here are some of our favorite devices to make you say '''''''!

#1. Taily - "The Tail That Wags When You Get Excited"

We're all fans of Necomimi, the "Brainwave Cat Ears," right? Right. I mean, without cat ears to wiggle, how will we ever know if you liked your donut? Well, Shota Ishiwatari, creator of the Necomimi prototype, isn't resting on his fuzzy laurels. Ladies and gentlemen, we give you Taily:

You wouldn't wear a jacket without pants. Now there's no need to wear those adorable kitty ears without a matching tail. You'll be the talk of the furry convention circuit, and your friends will never have to ask how you're feeling again!

#2. The H-Boya USB Creepy Kid

Source: audiocubes.com The letter "H" is bad. Very bad. So bad, in fact, that you need a bobbleheaded child to blink at you in creepy terror every time you type it. Yup. That's all the H-Boya does. It blinks when you type "H," because, as the story goes, "H is for Hentai," and that's bad. But terrifying robochildren who watch your every move? That's totally right.

#3. The Marriage-Hunting Bra

When a suitor is feeling amorous, the Marriage-Hunting Bra helps him check his intentions. The bra sports a digital countdown timer headed for the precise moment when its wearer wants to tie the knot. It also has a ring-carrying compartment and a pen holder, so you'll never be a a loss if you decide to jet off to Vegas for a quickie ceremony.

Lest you think we're just beating up on Japan, we give you two humble entries from other countries with too much time to burn. First up, China's entry:

#4. The Home Core Toilet-Sink

Source: yankodesign.com
The iPotty was child's play. The champion of the pro toilet circuit is industrial designer Dang Jingwei. His second toilet design (following the ingeniously low-tech Portable Paper Toilet) is the Home Core Integrated Toilet, which combines a sink, a vanity, and, of course, a toilet. It's a bit crowded for our tastes. Gray water recycling is a fantastic idea, and we're all for saving the environment, but a shower might be an easier place to start. 

And in case you think innovation is dead in the USA, we bring you the awesomeness that is:

5. The TV Hat

Yes, that's right. Theres no need to buy a battery-busting Galaxy Note II to watch movies when you can slap a magnifying glass over your iPhone. Plus, you get a super-cool hat to hide your identity from thieves who'll want to break into your house and steal the hat! Or the horrifying possibility that someone you know might see you wearing this thing.

Honorable mention: the GoJo.



Selasa, 22 Januari 2013

Mac Mini Tale Of Woe, Part Deux

The big ruckus of comments (118 and counting) following my Mac Mini post last week (see Apple Is No Longer Easy, A Mac Mini Tale Of Woe) convinced me to make one more try to fix the issue. Unfortunately, the woe goes on.

My Original Tale Of Mac Mini Woe

Here is a quick recap. My new Mac Mini booted for the first time last Saturday night. I went to the Apple App Store for software updates. The Mac Mini came with OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.1. At the App Store it got updated to Mountain Lion 10.8.2.

It appeared to be the same operating system that I was using on an external hard drive which was running my dying iMac for several months.

However, when I tried to boot the Mac Mini with the external drive, it would not boot the Mac Mini. That's not a normal thing for a Mac. I checked with some folks at Apple and was told that there are multiple builds of OS 10.8.2 out in the wild but only the latest version will boot the Mac Mini. Below is a snapshot of the build on the external drive.

Logically the fix was to download the latest version of Mountain Lion 10.8.2 and install it on my external drive. At that point the story gets weird. The Apple App Store would not let me download it and even told me that what it had just installed on my Mac Mini was incompatible with my Mac Mini.

Discussions with Apple friends yielded no suggestions. They did believe the problem would be fixed when OS X 10.8.3 is released. Clearly - except for in the minds of the most fervent Apple fans - this is a problem with the Apple App Store. My friends at Apple all acknowledged this with the hope that recent management changes might bring more focus to OS X and prevent this in the future.

Never Give Up

Whatever the cause of the problem, I didn't want to give up hope. A return trip to the Apple App Store with the old iMac using the Firewire Drive allowed me to download and install what in theory was the latest release of Mountain Lion. Unfortunately, it was the same version that was already on the external drive.

Next I tried 'System Restore' while booting the Mac Mini. This supposedly allows you to install a bootable operating system on either an internal or external drive.

It seemed to be working and indicated it was installing some new stuff on the external drive. In the end, however, it turned out to have the same build number - and it still won't boot the Mac Mini.

Why Boot From An External Drive?

Why would anyone want to boot from an external drive? First, it is a way of preserving your software investment. It gets you off the forced upgrade roller coaster that software companies seem to love so much. Second, if you ever have a problem with your internal drive or a new system install causes hiccups, you can boot from the external drive and get back to work quickly.

Years ago I paid $900 for raster image processing software only to watch it break on the next Mac OS upgrade. Fortunately I got a free upgrade that time, but I learned a valuable lesson. When the software broke again on the next major upgrade and there was a huge cost attached to the software upgrade, I was ready with a second drive that did not have to be updated. That way I could keep using the software I needed.

I will keep my fingers crossed that I don't have a problem with my Mac Mini. The App Store doesn't seem to be able to create another bootable drive, so an internal hard drive problem would be serious.

It appears that at least some things that once were easy don't even work at all now on the Mac.

(For the technical details of the latest efforts on the Mac Mini, check David's post on his own site:  Loving My Mac Mini, But Questioning Apple.)

Lead image courtesy of Apple.



Siri Jokes Aside, Voice Control Will Make Computing Better

In 1989, it was pure science fiction. Mere seconds after dictating cooking instructions into the oven, Marty's aging mother pulled a fully cooked pizza out of the voice-controlled Black & Decker contraption and served her family. "Boy oh boy, mom you sure can hydrate a pizza!" 

I'm referring, of course, to a scene from Back to the Future 2, but give or take a few details, it could have happened on the floor this year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES). From phones, tablets and TVs to cars and, yes, kitchen appliances, voice-controlled computing is weaving its way into our lives. And while some of the use cases may feel a little absurd at first, talking is a very natural way for us to request things and influence our surroundings. 

Artificial intelligence-fueled voice control took its biggest step toward the mainstream in 2011 with the launch of iOS 5 and Siri. As is typically the case, Apple didn't invent this technology, but rather found a way to polish it and fit it into a package that's easily digestible by the masses. And while Siri's "beta" label (and much of the early fun-poking) is fully deserved, it's easy to see where technology like this is headed and why it's a big deal. 

I recently found myself riding across Los Angeles in a friend's car. We had wrapped up our respective workdays and were en route to meet up with his wife for dinner. "Text Priya," he said into his phone, adding "See you in 15 minutes." He confirmed the message and sent it, all without removing his eyes from the road. As a tech writer, I was well aware of this functionality (and much more of what Siri can do), but here it was being used effortlessly in the wild by a self-described tech novice. It was so, so... normal. 

It's about to get way more normal. Only 15 months after Siri's arrival, voice-controlled computing is barreling ahead into the future. 

Apple, Google and Nuance: Advancing Voice Control in 2013

With each subsequent update to iOS, Apple is slowly nudging Siri forward, adding deeper intelligence, tying in additional data sources and improving its overall performance. Last year, Siri leaped from the iPhone to the iPad. Mac OS X now supports voice dictation, and few doubt the endlessly-rumored about Apple-branded HDTV will change channels when asked verbally. And if you think Siri can be a smart ass now, just wait. Apple is looking for people who can help inject a lot more personality into Siri. 

Meanwhile, Google is building sophisticated voice control into its Android operating system as well as its mobile apps for iOS and other platforms. Google Now is looking more and more like an impressive competitor to Siri - some say it's already better. The technology will soon find itself baked into hyper-futuristic wearable computing accessories like Google Glass. The recently released beta of Chrome 25 supports the Web Speech API, a standard that will allow developers to build voice control directly into Web apps. 

At the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) earlier this month, there was no shortage of voice-controlled gadgets for every room in the house, as well as the driveway. One of the most significant voice-related announcements came from Nuance. The company's Wintermute project promises intelligent, cross-device voice commands, which will be consistent and personalized across TVs, smartphones, tablets and other whatever other voice-controlled devices fill your home. If you ask your phone for the football game score and then later sit down and ask your TV to turn on "the game" it will know precisely which game you mean, just as it knows your other preferences, tendencies and linguistic quirks. 

The Future Of Computing With Our Voices

The cutesy personal assistants of today will evolve into what Nuance CTO Vlad Sejnoha has called "ubiquitous intelligent systems."  They will be much more nuanced, intelligent and discerning. 

Sejnoha cites a number of trends that will define the future of voice control. The improved accuracy of voice recognition and smarter natural language understanding will combine with our devices' increased awareness and ability to better discriminate between sounds to create a far more capable, intelligent system for communicating with machines.

"One area which we expect to gain more prominence is 'ambient voice recognition,'" Sejnoha told ReadWrite. "This includes the high-accuracy transcription of natural multi-speaker conferences and other spontaneous conversations between multiple participants."

This steady improvement of the underlying technology will coincide with the growing ubiquity of voice-controlled mobile interfaces (thanks primarily to Google and Apple). The result? Slowly but surely, voice control will become more accurate, useful and integrated into the gadgets we use - and eventually wear - everyday.  

In so many contexts, using our voices to control computers just makes sense. The in-car use case is one of the most obvious. I'd also much rather tell my connected television what I want to watch and make gestures on a tablet than fidget with keyboards or wave my arms around like a maniac in my living room. 

The more intelligent and integrated these systems get, the more seamless interacting with them will become. The use cases will be plentiful and far more sophisticated than even Marty McFly could have imagined.

Nice work, humanity. Now how about those hoverboards?

 

Lead photo by Vasile Cotovanu. 



Why Aren't There More/Better Software Design Tools?

You have a brilliant software idea. Now you need to design a good-looking prototype. You look around. You search high and low. Chances are you will dig up a sum total of three usable tools.

That's right, three.

Rapid Prototyping Is A Wasteland

Welcome to the largely ignored world of rapid prototyping.

If you design on the PC, you can choose from three tools:

  1. Axure RP ($290)
  2. Mockup Builder (free)
  3. Serena Prototype Composer 3 (free/$300)

If you prototype on the Mac, your three choices are:

  1. Axure RP
  2. Balsamic Mockups ($79)
  3. Sencha Architect ($400)

Balsamiq Mockups is a cross-platform rapid software prototyping tool that allows a UX designer to quickly create a mockup of software screens. This is a prototype I created for a next-generation CRM program. One major quibble: no ready-made icons for folders or documents.

If you develop mobile apps or websites, there are more choices, including Protoshare ($29/mo.), a Web-based (SaaS) software solution and Tiggzi ($40/mo.). If you like to design apps entirely on the iPad, there's AppCooker ($40), AppSketcher (free), Blueprint Lite (free), Interface HD ($10), iMockups for iPad ($7) and Mockop (free), plus many others.

According to an educated guess, there are some 12 million programmers worldwide. That's equal to the population of metropolitan Los Angeles.

Now imagine you are one of those 12 million LA inhabitants, and you have only three, maybe four, auto repair shops to choose from. What's wrong with that picture? The size of the global information technology industry was estimated at $3.8 trillion in 2012, according to Gartner.

The same CRM mockup created in Azure RP, another cross-platform prototyping tool, that creates more buttoned-up designs. Tools that address various software design work styles are much needed.

Here's a another cogent example. I searched the Home Depot site for cordless drills and found 348 search results. Try it yourself. And that's for a global power tool market that will reach only $27 billion by 2015.

The Disconnect Opportunity

Notice a disconnect here? In a previous post, I wrote about the need to create 1,000 user-experience (UX) design studios in the U.S. alone. These studios would require a healthy infrastructure of innovative rapid prototyping and coding tools. Yet it's clear that when it comes to creating software, designers lack much choice.

What type of prototyping tools are needed? For one, they should be collaborative. I know this because I found a sparse factoid on the design activities of programmers that suggests that unlike the relatively solitary activity of coding and testing, designing interfaces requires much collaborative work.

Finding the above statistic buried in a Microsoft site full of articles about finding bugs was a worrisome sign all in itself. You would think that, given a $4 trillion information technology economy, there would be a lot more research about software-design habits.

Please plug this innovation gap, entrepreneurs and venture capitalists! We need a lot more help to make software work the way it was intended. And do contribute to my crowdsourced ideation engine and suggest more ideas on what type of software is needed to help create a next-generation software economy.

 

Lead image courtesy of Shutterstock.



Senin, 21 Januari 2013

Apple Earnings: An Anxious World Awaits

Apple is not releasing any new products this week. Nevertheless, this will be one of the biggest and most important weeks in recent memory for Team Unicorn, because this week Apple reports its earnings for the holiday quarter.

Earnings are always a big deal, and earnings for the holiday quarter are always an even bigger deal, but this time it's even more bigger, as the kids say.

Because the numbers that Apple reports this week are not just numbers. They are a measure of Apple's magic.

For more than three months Apple stock has been in a massive swoon, dropping from just over $700 in September to $500 today. At first we all figured the stock was getting hit because investors who had made a fortune on Apple shares were dumping them in late 2012 to capture the profit before tax rates changed in 2013. 

But lately people seem to be thinking that decline is also based on fear that the party may be over for Apple.

The thinking goes like this: Sure, Apple has had an amazing ride since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007. But nothing lasts forever. Steve Jobs is gone, and Tim Cook is no Steve Jobs.

And consider what's happened on Cook's watch:

  • He brought in a Brit to run retail, then tossed the guy out after he turned out to be a train wreck. Right now there's nobody running retail, but Apple is doing a job search. As the search drags on, a senior vice president who supposedly wanted the top job got sick of waiting and bailed out. His job was filled by guy who used to be a VP of Finance. So, yeah. Good luck with that.
  • Cook booted out Scott Forstall, in part to squash a mutiny led by other execs (I'm looking at you, Bob Mansfield) who threatened to quit because they couldn't stand working with Forstall. Design boss Jon Ive, Mansfield's ally in the anti-Forstall guerrilla campaign, took over software design.
  • Forstall ran iOS software, and apparently he was so busy waging mean little wars against his colleagues and promoting himself in the press that he neglected Apple's software. Apple, which pioneered the smartphone space, now has fallen behind Google, whose software doesn't just work better, it also looks better. How did Apple ever let that happen?
  • The Maps fiasco. Forstall got the blame, but come on. This happened on Cook's watch, and Cook acts like the whole thing came as a surprise to him, as if he had no idea, before Maps shipped, that the stuff didn't work right. Meaning he'd never even looked at it and just trusted the software guys to get it right. Imagine Steve Jobs shipping a huge new product and never looking at it himself. I can't.

Is Apple Still Special?

Here's the deal, in a nutshell. If Apple beats expectations, all is well and the stock will surge. If Apple hits targets but doesn't exceed them, expect the stock to keep going sideways. If there are cracks in the foundation - if sales of iPads or iPhone come up short, or if sales are good but earnings are weak, look for the stock slide to continue.

But if Apple really blows it - if Apple really comes up short - well, if that happens then things are going to get ugly.

Because if mighty Apple can't deliver on a holiday quarter, this will prove what a lot of investors seem to be feeling in their gut already - that the iPhone is no longer special, no longer coveted, no longer in such huge demand. Or as Darcy Travlos writes in Forbes, that Apple may be losing its "brand equity."

It's not purely a matter of market share. By that metric Apple has already lost the fight, since Android now has 75% share and Apple has 15% in smartphones.

What worries Wall Street is something that's a little more difficult to quantify. It's the emotion around Apple products. For example: When the iPhone 5 came out last year, yes, there were lines outside Apple stores, but the whole thing felt a bit contrived. Some of the people weren't even there for the phone; they were there because they'd been paid by companies to stand in line wearing T-shirts with their logos on them. They were human billboards.

On the other hand, virtually all of my neighbors (I live in a suburb of Boston) carry iPhones. Virtually everyone I work with at Say Media, a groovy tech-forward company based in San Francisco and New York, carries an iPhone. So who knows? Maybe the magic is still there.

The Numbers

In case you're keeping score, here are the numbers that Wall Street is looking for and the ones you need to watch on Wednesday.

Apple previously told analysts it is expecting revenues of $52 billion, net income of $11 billion, earnings per share of $11.75. 

But Apple has a track record of sandbagging its earnings, predicting a low number then reporting a "blowout," which sends the stock skyrocketing. 

So analysts have started expecting better than what Apple tells them. In this case they're looking for $54.7 billion in revenues and earnings per share of  $13.41. But some are higher.  An analyst at Credit Suisse expects Apple do to $57.2 billion in revenues. Some on Wall Street are expecting $59 billion.

The classic Apple move, the one we've become accustomed to over the past few years, would be to blow past all of those numbers and report $60 billion in revenues, or even more, based on moving a gazillion units of iPhones.

Will that happen? Frankly, despite all the craziness I mentioned above, I would not be surprised. Apple remains an incredibly powerful brand. There seems to be huge demand for the iPad Mini. 

That's why there's so much suspense building up for Wednesday.

For what it's worth, here is what Apple's stock looks like over the past six months:

Stock chart from Yahoo. Lead image courtesy of Reuters.